The case has polarized Philippine society. Duterte’s supporters maintain he saved the country from the grip of drugs and criminality, while critics see his drug war as one of the darkest chapters in recent history. For victims, the stakes are deeply personal. Civil society groups such as the Duterte Panagutin Network have vowed to keep watch, both in court and through online livestreams, mobilizing public support for the victims’ cause.

The confirmation of charges hearing is expected to last several days. Should the Pre-Trial Chamber confirm the charges, a full trial will follow—potentially lasting years. If the charges are not confirmed, the case could collapse, a scenario victims and their lawyers are determined to prevent. “The Sept. 23 hearing is not just about Duterte,” said Conti. “It is about whether the thousands of lives lost in the drug war will finally be given dignity through truth and accountability.” As preparations intensify, one message from the victims and their legal teams is clear: They will resist any attempt to delay or derail the process.

Key Indicators

These developments signal increased international scrutiny on controversial law enforcement practices, potentially impacting diplomatic relations and foreign investment in nations facing similar allegations.
The progression of ICC proceedings against a former head of state serves as a leading indicator of growing global judicial accountability for political leaders.

Regional Perspective

The readiness of victims of the Philippine drug war to face former President Rodrigo Duterte at the ICC hearing on crimes against humanity highlights a focus on achieving justice and accountability for severe human rights violations during his tenure. This marks a pivotal moment for Filipino society in its pursuit of justice.

Immediate Implications

Governments and international bodies are expected to push for greater transparency and accountability in drug enforcement operations worldwide.
The period leading up to the September 23 hearing is critical, as attempts to influence legal proceedings or present counterarguments may occur, posing risks of delay or case collapse.

Analysis

This case underscores the growing role of the International Criminal Court in addressing large-scale human rights crimes. The victims' willingness to appear in court, despite their trauma, highlights the urgent need for justice. The trajectory of this case could influence how other nations handle similar situations and set a precedent for accountability in widespread human rights violations.