At its delegates' assembly in Schaffhausen, the Swiss People's Party (SVP) took a firm stance against the electronic identity (e-ID) and bilateral agreements with the EU. Party president Marcel Dätwyler rallied his base by highlighting concerns over "uncontrolled immigration", "declining prosperity", and "rising crime" in Switzerland. The party resolved to recommend the rejection of the e-ID project and the "initiative for the future" of the Young Socialists.

The SVP's delegates, at their meeting in Schaffhausen, adopted a clear position against the electronic identity (e-ID) project and the bilateral agreements with the EU. Party president Marcel Dätwyler called his base to mobilize against these developments, drawing attention to "uncontrolled immigration," "declining prosperity," and "rising crime" in Switzerland. Dätwyler expressed his deep concern about the impact of these issues on "Switzerland's deep identity," describing the bilateral agreements with the EU as a "treaty of submission" compared to the US import surcharge. A study presented by the party from the University of Fribourg indicates that the free movement of persons (LCP) with the EU represents a "ticking time bomb," reducing the quality of life in Switzerland to the EU level. The delegates overwhelmingly voted against the e-ID project, deeming it "dangerous, freedom-restricting, and unnecessary," and also unanimously rejected the "initiative for the future" proposed by the Young Socialists, which aims to impose inheritance tax to fund climate action measures.

This strong stance by the SVP comes at a critical juncture as Switzerland prepares to make decisions regarding its relationship with the EU and the future of digital transformation. The rejection of e-ID reflects concerns about privacy and surveillance, while the opposition to bilateral agreements directly challenges the current political course.

Regional Perspective

The SVP's rejection of e-ID and bilateral EU agreements reflects deep Swiss concerns about maintaining national sovereignty, controlling immigration, and protecting the country's unique economic and social model. The focus on "uncontrolled immigration" and "declining prosperity" indicates that these issues resonate strongly with Swiss voters, putting pressure on the government.

Immediate Implications

Impact on bilateral negotiations: The SVP's hardline stance could complicate ongoing negotiations with the EU regarding bilateral agreements, potentially affecting Swiss economic sectors that rely on these agreements.
Future of e-ID: The rejection of the project by an influential party like the SVP reinforces doubts about the future of e-ID in Switzerland and may lead to further public debate and skepticism towards government digital solutions.
Upcoming elections: This stance could influence upcoming federal elections, as the party seeks to mobilize its voter base around these issues.

Analysis

The SVP's position serves as a clear warning about the direction Switzerland is taking in its relationship with the EU and its adoption of digital technologies. Linking immigration to crime and declining prosperity is a common political narrative used by the party to garner support, but it raises questions about the accuracy of the data presented. Economically, rejecting bilateral agreements could have negative consequences for Swiss companies that benefit from direct access to the European market. Regarding e-ID, concerns about privacy and civil liberties are global issues, but the SVP's rejection of this technology reflects a cautious and conservative approach in Switzerland. The future course of these issues will pose a significant challenge for Swiss policymakers, who must balance economic interests, international relations, and societal concerns.